Project Veritas strikes again. Not only were they able to get a NYT reporter to admit the J6 crowd was littered with FBI agents and informers, but they got him to admit the mainstream media makes more out of it than it really was. He is heading for the unemployment line as we speak. New York Times National Security Correspondent, Matthew Rosenberg. Not only did he contradict his own reporting, but he admitted that the FBI was involved.
“There were a ton of FBI informants amongst the people who attacked the Capitol.“
It was like, me and two other colleagues who were there [January 6] outside and we were just having fun!”
“I know I’m supposed to be traumatized, but like, all these colleagues who were in the [Capitol] building and are like ‘Oh my God it was so scary!’ I’m like, ‘f*ck off!’”
“They were making too big a deal. They were making this an organized thing that it wasn’t.”
Via Project Veritas:
Project Veritas published a bombshell video on Tuesday showing Pulitzer Prize winning New York Times correspondent, Matthew Rosenberg, speaking about the events of January 6, 2021, in a way that contradicts his own reporting.
Rosenberg, who covers national security matters for the Times says on the undercover video that “there were a ton of FBI informants among the people who attacked the Capitol.”
This revelation is a break from Rosenberg’s reporting on the matter where he characterized such a notion of FBI informants in the crowd as a “reimagining of Jan. 6.”
This was not the only time Rosenberg’s commentary to Project Veritas’ undercover reporter directly contradicted his own published words. Despite telling a Veritas journalist that January 6 was “no big deal,” his article says that downplaying the events of that day was “the next big lie.”
Soundbites of Rosenberg published Tuesday show him saying, “It’s not a big deal as they [media] are making it, because they were making too big a deal. They were making this an organized thing that it wasn’t.”
The unemployment rate is about to jump by one.