El-Sayed Resists Yes-or-No Question on Condemning Iran's Government
El-Sayed Resists Yes-or-No Question on Condemning Iran's Government

Politics

El-Sayed Resists Yes-or-No Question on Condemning Iran’s Government

Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed repeatedly declined to give a direct yes-or-no answer when ABC News asked whether he condemns Iran’s current government, instead criticizing the question’s framing and pointing to the collapse of the Obama-era nuclear deal.

Michigan Democratic U.S. Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed declined to give a simple yes-or-no answer when asked directly whether he condemns Iran’s current government, calling the framing of the question itself “kind of an odd approach” during an ABC News interview released Monday.

Host Linsey Davis pressed El-Sayed repeatedly on the point. “For those who do want to hear, do you condemn the current Iranian regime? What do you say?” she asked.

El-Sayed responded by acknowledging Iran’s record while pivoting to broader foreign policy arguments. “They’ve engaged in horrific acts. There’s no question about that. I am for democracy. I’m for human rights,” he said. “But the big picture question is not — like, for us is, what’s in our best interest?”

He pointed back to the Obama-era nuclear agreement with Iran, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, arguing it had kept Iran’s nuclear program contained before the Trump administration withdrew from it. “We should not have torn up the JCPOA. We were in a position for nuclear containment, and we were in a position of peace,” El-Sayed said. “We should not have gone to war in the first place. We didn’t have clear war aims.”

When Davis followed up again, asking for a yes-or-no answer, El-Sayed again declined to give one directly. “I condemn a lot of their action. But if you want a pathway to peace with folks, you’re going to have to figure out how to get to a position of peace,” he said. He added that he also condemns “the Saudi human rights abuses,” noting that reporters don’t typically press him on that question.

“I just think this idea of like, condemn or not condemn, right? Is kind of an odd approach. I condemned the genocide that Israel has done. I condemned the apartheid, too. I condemned the attack on democracy that Iran has done. But we engage with actors in a world where you kind of have to figure out how to make peace with people you disagree with.”

El-Sayed said he wants the United States to pursue peace with Iran “like President Obama did,” while also rethinking relationships with other governments he accused of rights abuses, including Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, which he said is “doing genocide in Sudan.”

“Can we actually, objectively ask what our values are? We want to promote democracy all over the world,” he said, arguing that the question of condemning or not condemning Iran’s government is “secondary” to the question of how the U.S. gets to a “pathway to peace.”

Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

You May Also Like

Government Corruption

Updated 5/17/19 9:52am Jack Crane | Opinion  James Baker, Former-FBI General Counsel has joined Russian hoax media collaborator Michael Isikoff on his podcast, yesterday....

US Politics

I do not even know where to begin with this one.  Just when you think you have seen the worst that humanity has to...

US News

Education is considered to be one of the pillars of a successful life. Without a college degree, many believe these students will earn lower...

US News

ICYMI| If it were not for Tom Fitton and Judicial Watch, it is more than likely that the world would never know the extent...