Trump Administration Asks Supreme Court to Revive Voter Roll Verification Tool
Trump Administration Asks Supreme Court to Revive Voter Roll Verification Tool

Politics

Trump Administration Asks Supreme Court to Revive Voter Roll Verification Tool

The Justice Department is asking the Supreme Court to lift a lower-court block on an updated federal database that helps states remove ineligible voters from their rolls, setting up a fight over privacy and voting rights ahead of the midterms.

The Trump administration’s Department of Justice has asked the Supreme Court to step in and let the government use an updated version of a federal database program that states rely on to check whether people on their voter rolls are eligible to vote.

Solicitor General John Sauer filed the request on Tuesday, asking the justices to stay a June order from U.S. District Judge Sparkle Sooknanan, who was appointed to the District of Columbia court by former President Joe Biden. Sooknanan’s order blocked the government from using an updated version of the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements program, known as SAVE, which had been changed to make it easier for states to identify and remove ineligible voters, including foreign nationals, from their rolls.

Sauer described Sooknanan’s order as “indefensible,” arguing it “threatens the integrity of upcoming elections by vacating the federal government’s authority to internally use Social Security data when fulfilling its duty to respond to requests by States to verify the citizenship of individuals for voting and other purposes.”

“The order will irreparably harm the federal government, the States, and the public by depriving the government of an effective tool to verify the eligibility of registered voters and benefits applicants under various state and federal programs,” Sauer wrote in the filing to the Supreme Court.

Sooknanan, who was born in Trinidad and Tobago, had grounded her order in concerns about privacy and voting rights. She wrote that the updated SAVE program “implicates two fundamental rights that protect Americans from government overreach: the right to privacy and the right to vote,” and said the federal government “has knowingly trampled on the privacy rights of American citizens in a manner that threatens the sacred right to vote.”

“This Court cannot stand idly by while that happens,” Sooknanan wrote.

The dispute is now before the Supreme Court as League of Women Voters et al v. DHS, No. 26A. The outcome could determine whether states have access to the updated verification tool ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

You May Also Like

US Politics

I do not even know where to begin with this one.  Just when you think you have seen the worst that humanity has to...

Government Corruption

Updated 5/17/19 9:52am Jack Crane | Opinion  James Baker, Former-FBI General Counsel has joined Russian hoax media collaborator Michael Isikoff on his podcast, yesterday....

US News

Education is considered to be one of the pillars of a successful life. Without a college degree, many believe these students will earn lower...

US News

ICYMI| If it were not for Tom Fitton and Judicial Watch, it is more than likely that the world would never know the extent...