A striking report from the National Post of Canada reveals that 87% of individuals flagged as “terror suspects” attempting to enter the United States through land borders in 2024 came from Canada. The statistics, sourced from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), highlight a significant security concern often overshadowed by the focus on the southern border with Mexico.
The term “terror suspect” refers to individuals listed in the U.S. Terrorist Screening Dataset (TSDS), a database that includes people under legal investigation for terrorism, members of terrorist organizations, and individuals with familial or other ties to suspected terrorists. Being listed in the TSDS does not automatically classify someone as a terrorist. The report specifically covers individuals attempting to cross legally at designated border points, excluding those who might evade law enforcement altogether.
In 2024, CBP intercepted 358 individuals from the TSDS attempting to cross from Canada into the United States, compared to 52 intercepted at the Mexican border. This 87% figure is consistent with trends in recent years. For example:
- In 2022, 82% of the 380 suspects stopped at U.S. land borders came from Canada.
- In 2023, 86% of the 564 suspects stopped also came from the northern border.
While these numbers pertain to individuals identified in official databases and attempting legal entry, they raise questions about the relative security of the U.S.-Canada border, which is often regarded as less problematic than its southern counterpart.
The findings spotlight a growing security concern along the northern border. While public discourse and political attention largely focus on the southern border due to its higher volume of undocumented crossings, the northern border presents its own challenges, particularly in monitoring individuals flagged as potential security threats.
Experts suggest several factors contribute to the Canadian connection. Canada’s immigration policies and border management have traditionally been viewed as less stringent than those of the United States, creating potential vulnerabilities. Moreover, the shared language and open-border policies between the two nations for trade and travel make covert movements less conspicuous than those at the southern border.
The timing of the National Post report coincides with President-elect Donald Trump’s recent proposal to impose a 25% tariff on Canadian and Mexican goods. Trump argues this measure is necessary until both countries take stronger action against illegal migration, human trafficking, drug smuggling, and other cross-border crimes.
During a press event, Trump emphasized, “We need our neighbors to step up. Canada and Mexico must do their part to curb the flow of threats entering our borders. If they don’t, tariffs are just the beginning.”
The increase in TSDS-listed individuals attempting entry from Canada follows a post-pandemic uptick in global migration and transnational crime. While the numbers themselves do not confirm active terror plots, they indicate the persistent challenge of identifying and intercepting individuals who might pose risks.
Critics of the data’s implications argue that TSDS classifications can be overly broad, encompassing individuals whose links to terrorism are tenuous at best. Nonetheless, the numbers raise questions about Canada’s ability to monitor and control individuals who might exploit legal travel pathways to enter the United States.
The Canadian border spans over 5,500 miles, including remote areas difficult to patrol. Unlike the heavily monitored and physically fortified U.S.-Mexico border, the northern border relies more on bilateral cooperation and intelligence-sharing between U.S. and Canadian authorities.
The lower volume of undocumented crossings from Canada compared to Mexico often leads to less public scrutiny. However, the higher proportion of flagged terror suspects entering from Canada suggests that vulnerabilities at legal crossing points may warrant increased attention.
The report raises concerns about how U.S. border policies will evolve under the Trump administration. Trump’s stance on tariffs underscores a broader strategy of pressuring neighboring nations to align more closely with U.S. security priorities.
As discussions about border security continue, the northern border’s role in U.S. national security is likely to receive more focus. Enhanced vetting processes, increased personnel, and more advanced technology at border crossings may become central to addressing these concerns.
While the U.S.-Mexico border often dominates the immigration and national security narrative, the northern border’s statistics on terror suspects serve as a reminder of the multifaceted challenges in safeguarding the United States. The 87% figure is a call to action for policymakers to balance resources and attention between both borders to address emerging threats effectively.
The numbers suggest that as much as the southern border demands vigilance, the quieter but expansive northern frontier may require its own robust security measures.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login