Sacramento Judge Upholds Revised Ballot Title for Proposition 39 Voter ID Measure
Sacramento Judge Upholds Revised Ballot Title for Proposition 39 Voter ID Measure

Politics

Sacramento Judge Upholds Revised Ballot Title for Proposition 39 Voter ID Measure

A Sacramento County judge has upheld the state’s revised ballot title for Proposition 39, a voter ID and citizenship verification measure, after supporters challenged the wording as prejudicial ahead of ballots going out October 5.

A Sacramento County Superior Court judge has rejected a legal challenge from supporters of Proposition 39, a California constitutional amendment on voter identification and citizenship verification, after the measure’s official ballot title was changed ahead of its release in the state’s voter guide.

Ballots begin going out to California voters on October 5. When the measure first qualified for the ballot, the Secretary of State described it using the Attorney General’s circulating title: “Establishes Additional Voter Identification and Citizenship Verification Requirements.”

The title that will appear in the official voter guide reads differently: “Prohibits Citizens From Voting Unless They Present Government-Issued Identification.”

Supporters of Proposition 39 challenged the revised wording in Sacramento County Superior Court, arguing it was prejudicial to the measure. The judge rejected that argument, ruling that the new title and summary accurately described the measure’s effects.

The dispute has drawn attention beyond the courtroom. In a column published by Red State, former U.S. Congressman Mike Garcia, now chairman of America First California at the America First Policy Institute, argued that the change in wording matters regardless of how the court ruled, saying the Attorney General’s office should aim for neutral descriptions of ballot measures rather than language that could shape voters’ first impressions.

“The question isn’t simply whether each word can be defended as technically accurate. It’s whether the government’s description gives voters a neutral understanding of the policy choice before them,” Garcia wrote.

California’s ballot initiative process allows voters to amend statutes and the state Constitution directly, with the Attorney General’s office responsible for preparing the official titles and summaries that appear before voters encounter the full text of a measure.

The Sacramento County Superior Court’s ruling allows the revised title and summary to stand as voting begins this month.

Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

You May Also Like

Government Corruption

Updated 5/17/19 9:52am Jack Crane | Opinion  James Baker, Former-FBI General Counsel has joined Russian hoax media collaborator Michael Isikoff on his podcast, yesterday....

US Politics

I do not even know where to begin with this one.  Just when you think you have seen the worst that humanity has to...

US News

Education is considered to be one of the pillars of a successful life. Without a college degree, many believe these students will earn lower...

US News

ICYMI| If it were not for Tom Fitton and Judicial Watch, it is more than likely that the world would never know the extent...