Government Corruption

BREAKING! Facebook’s Partner In Censoring Conservatives LEAKED … This Is TREASON!

One thing we know first hand is how unscrupulous Facebook is.

Zuckerberg, Sandberg and their cast of beta censors over there in Palo Alto have screwed over the vast majority (if not every single) partner they have ever had.

Facebook took well over a quarter of a MILLION DOLLARS from our company for advetising to build our pages and once they had their money (and we had our political victory with Trump winning the White House) they simply deleted half our pages and took the reach away from what remained.

Our interactivity scored were as high, if not higher than, anyone on the platform, but ostensibly because we are Trump supporters, they don’t need to honor their contracts with us.

FINALLY, the truth about what these social media giants have done to conservative media … and who they were working with do it, has just been exposed for the whole world to see …

Patty McMurray for The Gateway Pundit reported:

This past week we found out that the State Department was, and probably still is, funding far-left activist fact-checkers to attack conservative media, politicians and personalities. 

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Daniel Kimmage Deposition By MO and LA AGs Reveals State Department Was Funding Online Fact-Checkers to Censor Speech

This reminded us of the below 100% Fed Up article by Patty McMurray in October of 2020.  We have reprinted it below in its entirety.  

Facebook’s Far-Left, Activist, “Fact-Checking” Group “Science Feedback” Should Scare The Hell Out Of Every Conservative

BY PATTY MCMURRAY | OCT 20, 2020

TRENDING: “My Pronouns are Prosecute/Fauci” – Twitter Owner ELON MUSK to Release the Twitter Files on COVID and Dr Fauci

In 2016, only 9 days before the election, without warning, we received a notification from Facebook that our 100 Percent Fed Up Facebook page with almost 1 million followers (we currently have almost 1.7 million followers) was UNPUBLISHED and would not be republished.

After Breitbart News wrote about Facebook shutting down our page for no reason, Facebook reinstated it. Their only explanation was that “This was a mistake.”

So far, Facebook has not shut down our popular page before the November election. Instead, like many conservative Facebook pages, we’ve been hit with multiple, untrue fact-check violations by leftist, third-party “fact-checkers.” For the past 3 months, traffic on our Facebook page has been drastically reduced. Is it a coincidence that traffic on our pro-Trump, 100 Percent Fed Up Facebook page has been reduced by approximately 90% only months before a critical election?

“False news” or “misinformation” violations by third-party fact-checkers hired by Facebook, gives them the green-light to “demote,” or hide posts on their platform, including valuable information that is of interest to Americans about the upcoming election. Much of the news we publish is news the Democrat Party’s mainstream media refuses to publish or news the dishonest media intentionally distorts  to paint a favorable picture of Democratic Party candidates.

On Oct. 11, 100 Percent Fed Up received two “false news” violations for the same article on Facebook.

The violations were from the far-left activist “fact-checking” group, Science Feedback, related to an article we wrote about a Chinese virologist who fled China out of fear for her safety after claiming that COVID-19 was manufactured in China’s only biosafety level-4 super laboratory. The laboratory where she worked is only a few miles away from the Wuhan wet market, where Chinese officials claim the coronavirus emanated. Human infectious diseases are researched in the lab, including the novel coronavirus.

The second paragraph in our article states: “While there is not yet clear evidence that the coronavirus originated in the lab where it was being studied, it has not been ruled out as the origin of the global COVID-19 pandemic,”

Science Feedback responded to our article that shared the top Chinese virologist’s claim: “The virus causing COVID-19 most likely evolved in natural wildlife populations before spreading to humans.

“Most likely?” When someone uses the term “most likely,” it denotes that they are not in possession of factual evidence but instead, have a strong suspicion that what they are saying is true. From the Merriam Webster dictionary:

Definition of most likely: more likely than notprobably

It will most likely rain tomorrow.

False News and “Most likely” is not the same thing—and yet, when we appealed the violation with Science Feeback, the activist “fact-checker” hired by Facebook denied our appeal, telling us that they would not remove the violation from our page, knowing full well that their violation would keep the news we publish hidden from our 1.7 million followers until after the election.  READ MORE AT THE GATEWAY PUNDIT HERE

 

Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

You May Also Like

Government Corruption

Updated 5/17/19 9:52am Jack Crane | Opinion  James Baker, Former-FBI General Counsel has joined Russian hoax media collaborator Michael Isikoff on his podcast, yesterday....

US Politics

I do not even know where to begin with this one.  Just when you think you have seen the worst that humanity has to...

US News

Education is considered to be one of the pillars of a successful life. Without a college degree, many believe these students will earn lower...

US News

ICYMI| If it were not for Tom Fitton and Judicial Watch, it is more than likely that the world would never know the extent...