The Wall Street Journal recently voiced its frustration with Donald Trump’s slow action in addressing the issue of violent illegal aliens. Yet, pro-life activists have a more pressing concern regarding the fate of ten protestors currently imprisoned.
These individuals were jailed under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act, a tool wielded by Joe Biden and Merrick Garland to impose lengthy sentences. Interestingly, the Department of Justice has shown a starkly different approach to those who have attacked pro-life centers, despite the FACE Act being relevant to both situations.
What has been particularly controversial is the refusal of Garland and the DoJ to even arrest individuals protesting outside the homes of Supreme Court justices, demonstrations that clearly breach federal law.
Many anticipated that Trump would issue pardons for these individuals, particularly aligning with the timing of pardons for the January 6th protestors. The absence of immediate action has raised concerns among supporters, but the Daily Wire’s Mary Margaret Olohan reports that Trump has plans to address this soon.
Sources have disclosed to The Daily Wire that President Donald Trump intends to pardon the pro-life activists incarcerated by the Biden administration within days. The situation of these imprisoned individuals is a top priority for Trump’s team, and their release is anticipated imminently.
This news aligns with the upcoming 52nd annual March for Life, a significant peaceful gathering in Washington D.C. aimed at raising awareness about the impact of abortions. Trump is expected to participate in the rally via a pre-recorded message.
Trump has consistently criticized the Biden Justice Department for targeting pro-lifers with what he describes as “outrageous charges.” On the campaign trail, he vowed to review the cases of every political prisoner wronged by the Biden regime to ensure their release. This commitment to justice is a beacon of hope for those currently behind bars, including Lauren Handy, John Hinshaw, Jonathan Darnell, Herb Geraghty, Jean Marshall, Joan Bell, Paulette Harlow, Bevelyn Williams, Heather Idoni, and Calvin Zastrow.
The question remains: did these individuals breach the FACE Act? While juries convicted them, citing their obstruction of access to abortion facilities, the harsh penalties for non-violent protestors are unsettling. This contrasts sharply with the leniency shown to left-wing protestors, even those who attacked pro-life clinics. Garland attempted to justify the discrepancy by pointing out that the latter occurred at night, a reasoning that left many, including commentator Beege, astounded.
Senator Mike Lee highlighted this inconsistency, challenging Garland over the DOJ’s lack of action against terrorism directed at pro-life clinics and questioning the raid on Mark Houck. Garland’s explanation that pro-lifers were targeted for daytime protests, unlike nighttime attacks on pregnancy centers, was met with skepticism. In response, Lee, alongside Rep. Chip Roy, introduced a bill to repeal the FACE Act, aiming to curb federal overreach in local clinic-related matters.
Senator Lee, determined to prevent another Democrat-led assault on pro-life activists, plans to reintroduce legislation to dismantle the FACE Act. He told The Daily Signal that Biden’s misuse of the FACE Act against pro-life and faith-based individuals should be consigned to history. Rep. Chip Roy echoed this sentiment, emphasizing the need to protect Americans from a biased justice system that has unfairly targeted pro-life advocates.
The 21 convicted pro-lifers, many represented by the Thomas More Society, a Catholic law firm, formally requested full and unconditional pardons from Trump on January 15. This plea underscores the urgency of their situation and the perceived injustice of their imprisonment.
Trump’s potential timing of the pardons to coincide with the March for Life suggests a strategic move to bolster support for the pro-life cause.
Every day these individuals spend in prison highlights the perceived disparity between their punishment and their actions. Critics argue that they were penalized more for their beliefs than their deeds, while Garland and Biden seemingly ignored more violent acts that aligned with their political views. The call to “Free the Ten” is not just a plea for justice but a demand to restore faith in an impartial legal system.
The argument against allowing future Attorneys General to interfere in local law enforcement around clinics is gaining momentum. The actions of Garland and Biden have demonstrated the risks of granting such power to the federal government. The public’s trust in these institutions has been shaken, prompting calls for reform.
In a recent development, Trump has answered the call for justice. He issued pardons to 23 pro-life activists, a move that was announced in the Oval Office.
Trump remarked, “They should not have been prosecuted… Ridiculous.” This decision was well-received by supporters as a triumph for those advocating for life and justice.
As these individuals reunite with their families, the focus shifts to ensuring that such a situation does not arise again. The repeal of the FACE Act stands as a crucial step in safeguarding the rights of pro-life advocates against politically motivated prosecution. The pro-life community remains vigilant, determined to protect their cause and prevent future injustices.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login